Winning Together / Similar games

18 games like Winning Together

The best games like Winning Together are Dragon Castle, Azul and Calico — the closest of 18 ranked alternatives, scored by shared mechanics and category. Dragon Castle shares abstract strategy, pattern building, pattern recognition with Winning Together.

Every alternative below links to its own Winning Together-style fact page, drawn from MeeplePick’s abstract strategy shelf.

Ranked by shared category (3 pts) and mechanics (2 pts), bonus within 0.7 of Winning Together’s 1.9 weight, then BoardGameGeek’s Bayesian rating — one entry per series, 18 shown.

As an Amazon Associate, MeeplePick earns from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

1. 1. Dragon Castle (2017)
   2–4 players · 30–45 min · ★ 7.2 · Medium-light
   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building, Pattern Recognition · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)
   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 4 · ~18 min longer · same complexity
   View Dragon Castle on Amazon →
2. 2. Azul (2017)
   2–4 players · 30–45 min · ★ 7.8 · Medium-light
   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)
   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 4 · ~18 min longer · 0.2 lighter
   View Azul on Amazon →
3. 3. Calico (2020)
   1–4 players · 30–45 min · ★ 7.9 · Medium-light
   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)
   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · plays solo · scales to 4 · ~18 min longer · +0.3 heavier
   View Calico on Amazon →
4. 4. Santorini (2016)
   2–4 players · 20 min · ★ 7.5 · Medium-light
   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)
   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 4 · about the same length · 0.2 lighter
5. 5. Tiny Towns (2019)
   1–6 players · 45–60 min · ★ 7.3 · Medium-light
   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)
   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · plays solo · scales to 6 · ~33 min longer · same complexity
6. 6. Cathedral (1978)
   2 players · 20 min · ★ 6.5 · Medium-light
   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building, Pattern Recognition · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)
   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · about the same length · same complexity
7. 7. Mensa Connections (2004)
   1–4 players · 45 min · ★ 7.1 · Medium-light
   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)
   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · plays solo · scales to 4 · ~25 min longer · same complexity
8. 8. Qwirkle Cubes (2009)
   2–4 players · 45 min · ★ 6.6 · Medium-light
   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building, Pattern Recognition · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)
   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 4 · ~25 min longer · 0.3 lighter
9. 9. Reef (2018)
   2–4 players · 30–45 min · ★ 7.1 · Medium-light
   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)
   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 4 · ~18 min longer · same complexity
10. 10. Crystallo (2018)
    1 players · 20–30 min · ★ 7.1 · Medium-light
    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building, Pattern Recognition · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)
    vs Winning Together: no player-count overlap (1–1 vs 2–2) · plays solo · about the same length · 0.2 lighter
11. 11. Zendo (2001)
    3–5 players · 60 min · ★ 7.3 · Medium
    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Recognition · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)
    vs Winning Together: no player-count overlap (3–5 vs 2–2) · scales to 5 · ~40 min longer · +0.6 heavier
12. 12. IOTA (2012)
    2–4 players · 30 min · ★ 6.2 · Medium-light
    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building, Pattern Recognition · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)
    vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 4 · ~10 min longer · same complexity
13. 13. Cottage Garden (2016)
    1–4 players · 45–60 min · ★ 6.9 · Medium-light
    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)
    vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · plays solo · scales to 4 · ~33 min longer · same complexity
14. 14. Phoenix (2003)
    2 players · 20 min · ★ 6.4 · Medium-light
    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building, Pattern Recognition · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)
    vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · about the same length · 0.3 lighter
15. 15. Qwirkle Collector's Edition (2006)
    2–4 players · 45 min · ★ 6.8 · Medium-light
    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)
    vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 4 · ~25 min longer · 0.3 lighter
16. 16. Carnac (2011)
    2 players · 20 min · ★ 6.9 · Medium-light
    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, I Cut, Pattern Building · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)
    vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · about the same length · +0.5 heavier
17. 17. On the Dot (2006)
    2–4 players · 5 min · ★ 6.2 · Medium-light
    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building, Pattern Recognition · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)
    vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 4 · ~15 min shorter · 0.3 lighter
18. 18. Swish (2011)
    2–6 players · 10 min · ★ 6.1 · Light
    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building, Pattern Recognition · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)
    vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 6 · ~10 min shorter · 0.7 lighter

Looking for the original? See the full Winning Together fact page — players, play time, age and complexity.