Winning Together / Similar games

18 games like Winning Together

The best games like Winning Together are Dragon Castle, Azul and Calico — the closest of 18 ranked alternatives, scored by shared mechanics and category. Dragon Castle shares abstract strategy, pattern building, pattern recognition with Winning Together.

Every alternative below links to its own Winning Together-style fact page, drawn from MeeplePick’s abstract strategy shelf.

Ranked by shared category (3 pts) and mechanics (2 pts), bonus within 0.7 of Winning Together’s 1.9 weight, then BoardGameGeek’s Bayesian rating — one entry per series, 18 shown.

As an Amazon Associate, MeeplePick earns from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

1. 

   1. Dragon Castle (2017)

   2–4 players · 30–45 min · ★ 7.2 · Medium-light · See Dragon Castle alternatives →

   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building, Pattern Recognition · 3 shared tags · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)

   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 4 · ~18 min longer · same complexity

   Check price for Dragon Castle →
2. 

   2. Azul (2017)

   2–4 players · 30–45 min · ★ 7.8 · Medium-light · See Azul alternatives →

   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building · 2 shared tags · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)

   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 4 · ~18 min longer · 0.2 lighter

   Check price for Azul →
3. 

   3. Calico (2020)

   1–4 players · 30–45 min · ★ 7.9 · Medium-light · See Calico alternatives →

   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building · 2 shared tags · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)

   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · plays solo · scales to 4 · ~18 min longer · +0.3 heavier

   Check price for Calico →
4. 

   4. Santorini (2016)

   2–4 players · 20 min · ★ 7.5 · Medium-light · See Santorini alternatives →

   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building · 2 shared tags · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)

   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 4 · about the same length · 0.2 lighter
5. 

   5. Tiny Towns (2019)

   1–6 players · 45–60 min · ★ 7.3 · Medium-light · See Tiny Towns alternatives →

   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building · 2 shared tags · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)

   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · plays solo · scales to 6 · ~33 min longer · same complexity
6. 

   6. Cathedral (1978)

   2 players · 20 min · ★ 6.5 · Medium-light · See Cathedral alternatives →

   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building, Pattern Recognition · 3 shared tags · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)

   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · about the same length · same complexity
7. 

   7. Mensa Connections (2004)

   1–4 players · 45 min · ★ 7.1 · Medium-light · See Mensa Connections alternatives →

   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building · 2 shared tags · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)

   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · plays solo · scales to 4 · ~25 min longer · same complexity
8. 

   8. Qwirkle Cubes (2009)

   2–4 players · 45 min · ★ 6.6 · Medium-light

   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building, Pattern Recognition · 3 shared tags · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)

   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 4 · ~25 min longer · 0.3 lighter
9. 

   9. Reef (2018)

   2–4 players · 30–45 min · ★ 7.1 · Medium-light · See Reef alternatives →

   Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building · 2 shared tags · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)

   vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 4 · ~18 min longer · same complexity
10. 

    10. Crystallo (2018)

    1 players · 20–30 min · ★ 7.1 · Medium-light

    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building, Pattern Recognition · 3 shared tags · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)

    vs Winning Together: no player-count overlap (1 vs 2) · plays solo · about the same length · 0.2 lighter
11. 

    11. Zendo (2001)

    3–5 players · 60 min · ★ 7.3 · Medium

    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Recognition · 2 shared tags · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)

    vs Winning Together: no player-count overlap (3–5 vs 2) · scales to 5 · ~40 min longer · +0.6 heavier
12. 

    12. IOTA (2012)

    2–4 players · 30 min · ★ 6.2 · Medium-light

    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building, Pattern Recognition · 3 shared tags · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)

    vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 4 · ~10 min longer · same complexity
13. 

    13. Cottage Garden (2016)

    1–4 players · 45–60 min · ★ 6.9 · Medium-light · See Cottage Garden alternatives →

    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building · 2 shared tags · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)

    vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · plays solo · scales to 4 · ~33 min longer · same complexity
14. 

    14. Phoenix (2003)

    2 players · 20 min · ★ 6.4 · Medium-light

    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building, Pattern Recognition · 3 shared tags · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)

    vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · about the same length · 0.3 lighter
15. 

    15. Qwirkle Collector's Edition (2006)

    2–4 players · 45 min · ★ 6.8 · Medium-light · See Qwirkle Collector's Edition alternatives →

    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building · 2 shared tags · 1 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (33%)

    vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 4 · ~25 min longer · 0.3 lighter
16. 

    16. Carnac (2011)

    2 players · 20 min · ★ 6.9 · Medium-light

    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, I Cut, Pattern Building · 3 shared tags · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)

    vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · about the same length · +0.5 heavier
17. 

    17. On the Dot (2006)

    2–4 players · 5 min · ★ 6.2 · Medium-light

    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building, Pattern Recognition · 3 shared tags · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)

    vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 4 · ~15 min shorter · 0.3 lighter
18. 

    18. Swish (2011)

    2–6 players · 10 min · ★ 6.1 · Light

    Shares with Winning Together: Abstract Strategy, Pattern Building, Pattern Recognition · 3 shared tags · 2 of Winning Together’s 3 mechanics (67%)

    vs Winning Together: both play at 2 · scales to 6 · ~10 min shorter · 0.7 lighter

Looking for the original? See the full Winning Together fact page — players, play time, age and complexity.